linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] mtd: maps: gpio-addr-flash: Add support for device-tree devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:46:09 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Zhouyang Jia <jiazhouyang09@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/10] mtd: maps: gpio-addr-flash: Add support for
 device-tree devices

On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:04:52 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:12 PM Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 11:54:18 +0200
> > Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > Hi Boris
> > >
> > > Just seen that  you already did the rebase at
> > > https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-0day/commits/mtd/physmap-cleanup
> > >
> > > Thanks for that.
> > >
> > > I am about to test it in real hw (unless you want me wait)  
> >
> > Sure, go ahead and test it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Boris  
> I had to change this on your patchset to have it working on hw:
> https://pastebin.com/78A7yhJ9
> 
> If you send the patchset to the mailing list I can review it patch by patch.
> 
> Also
> mtd: maps: Prepare merging of physmap and physmap_of

It seems to compile just fine here. Is there a problem at runtime?