linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Add missing KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:32:16 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Add missing KVM_AMD dependency

On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:52:46PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
> Does it make sense to move all the SEV specific code in svm-sev.c ?
> I am looking to add SEV migration support very soon, and can see
> myself adding more SEV command handling which will grow svm.c further.

Amen to that - svm.c is pretty huge already. And if you end up moving
facilities, you can simply call it sev.c

Just my 2¢.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)