linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:42:24 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Tim.Bird@...y.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the
 enforcement paragraph pending community discussion

On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:37:48PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>  
> > I happen to think that the fact that the TAB cannot compel where it
> > cannot persuade is a huge strength of the system because it means
> > there's no power structure to subvert if someone were interested in
> > using it to try to impose their own viewpoint on the community.  But
> > that's just my opinion and I did write the TAB charter, so I'm probably
> > biased in this viewpoint.
> 
> The TAB can't handle it anyway because the privacy promise about
> reporting is incompatible with reality for three reasons (and I bet there
> are more)

Really you want to keep any reporting private from people on the TAB
because they're going to be interviewing you for a job in a couple
years.

regards,
dan carpenter