linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 20:10:15 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com" <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "megha.dey@...el.com" <megha.dey@...el.com>,
        "frederic@...nel.org" <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 04:34:05PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
> >> 3. perf_event_pmu_context owns RB tree of events. Since we don't 
> >>   need rotation across multiple hardware PMUs, the rotation is 
> >>   within same perf_event_pmu_context.  
> > 
> > By keeping the RB trees in perf_event_context, we get bigger trees,
> > which is more efficient (log(n+m) < log(n) + log(m))
> > 
> > Also, specifically, it means we only need a single merge sort /
> > iteration to schedule in a full context, instead of (again) doing 'n' of
> > them.
> > 
> > Also, given a context and a pmu, it is cheaper for finding the relevant
> > events; this is needed for big.little for instance. Something the
> > proposed patch doesn't fully flesh out.
> 
> Would it be faster if we add a perf_event_pmu_context pointer to the 
> perf_event? 

+       pmu_ctx = find_get_pmu_context(pmu, ctx, event);
+       if (IS_ERR(pmu_ctx)) {
+               err = PTR_ERR(pmu_ctx);
+               goto err_locked;
+       }
+       event->pmu_ctx = pmu_ctx;

Like that?