linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ata: add Buddha PATA controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:12:08 +0200
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: add Buddha PATA controller driver


On 10/18/2018 02:41 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +static int __init pata_buddha_init_one(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct zorro_dev *z = NULL;
>> +
>> +	while ((z = zorro_find_device(ZORRO_WILDCARD, z))) {
> 
> I'm not really an m68k expert, but shouldn't this implement a
> struct zorro_driver instead?  (or maybe two of them as xsurf
> seems sufficiently different).

I didn't want to introduce too many changes over old IDE's
driver in the initial version of the libata driver as
I can't test them myself. Once the new driver is verified
to work I plan to convert it into proper Zorro_driver.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics