lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:58:08 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: ptrace: Add function argument access API

On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:21:28 -0700
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:26 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anyone have any issues with this patch?
> >  
> 
> I'm conceptually okay with it.  That being said,
> regs_within_kernel_stack(), which you're indirectly using, is
> off-by-a-few.  And updating it to use probe_kernel_read() might be
> nice for robustness.
>

A patch to protect regs_within_kernel_stack() with
probe_kernel_read() has already been accepted. Can someone give an
Acked-by on this patch? As it does touch x86.

Thanks!

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ