linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:54:44 -0400
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangnan0@...wei.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, kan.liang@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode



On 10/29/2018 6:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:32:40 -0400
> 
>> -				  struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused)
>> + struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused,
>> +				  atomic_t *nr_rb_read __maybe_unused)
>>   {
> 
> What is going on with the indentations of this patch?
> 

Sorry, my editor auto wraps the line.
The patch has been sent in a separate email.

Thanks,
Kan