linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/virtio: add in/out fence support for explicit synchronization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:10:27 +0100
From:   Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To:     Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
Cc:     Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/virtio: add in/out fence support for explicit
 synchronization

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 06:13:52PM +0100, Robert Foss wrote:
> Hey Gerd,
> 
> On 2018-11-09 11:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:25:05PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 11:42, Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > When the execbuf call receives an in-fence it will get the dma_fence
> > > > related to that fence fd and wait on it before submitting the draw call.
> > > > 
> > > > On the out-fence side we get fence returned by the submitted draw call
> > > > and attach it to a sync_file and send the sync_file fd to userspace. On
> > > > error -1 is returned to userspace.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
> > > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v3:
> > > >   - Move all in_fence handling to the same VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN block
> > > Fwiw my suggestion was to explicitly document whether the IOCTL can
> > > support, simultaneously, IN and OUT fence.
> > 
> > Yes, that would be good.  Code looks like it is supposed to work, but
> > explicitly saying so in the commit message would be nice.
> 
> On it! Will send out a v5.
> 
> > 
> > Also: should we use separate fields for in/out fds?
> 
> I'm not sure I understand which fields you're referring to.

fence_in_fd & fence_out_fd in the ioctl struct (patch #2).

cheers,
  Gerd