linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] clocksource: imx-gpt: add necessary kfree to avoid resource leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 18 Nov 2018 02:52:36 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] clocksource: imx-gpt: add necessary kfree to avoid
 resource leak


Hi Anson,

On 06/11/2018 10:12, Anson Huang wrote:

[ ... ]

>>>> Please convert to timer-of API.
>>>
>>> This patch mainly to fix the potential resource leak issue, for
>>> converting to timer-of API, should I add another patch for it? Since
>>> it is a different subject.
>>
>> Actually I was unclear. The patch is duplicating the kfree in the error path,
>> usually a rollback routine should be provided.
>>
>> So instead of creating this rollback path, you can directly use the timer-of
>> which contains the error check and rollback.
> 
> I understand the timer-of can save some code in timer driver, but current GPT
> driver is kind of complicated in order to support so many i.MX platforms with
> different GPT design, change it to timer-of will need some effort and I think we
> can do it later. If the duplicating kfree in error path confuses you, I can change
> it to rollback path you said. Below are 2 options in my mind:
> 
> 1. add kfree to rollback path;
> 2. skip this patch, just apply 1/2 patch, and let me find some time to change GPT
> driver using timer-of. 
> 
> Which one do you prefer? Thanks.

I'm fine with option 2.

Thanks

  -- Daniel

-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog