linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 12/36] rtc: cmos: Do not export alarm rtc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:52:16 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 12/36] rtc: cmos: Do not export alarm rtc_ops when we do not support alarms

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit fbb974ba693bbfb4e24a62181ef16d4e45febc37 ]

When there is no IRQ configured for the RTC, the rtc-cmos code does not
support alarms, all alarm rtc_ops fail with -EIO / -EINVAL.

The rtc-core expects a rtc driver which does not support rtc alarms to
not have alarm ops at all. Otherwise the wakealarm sysfs attr will read
as empty rather then returning an error, making it impossible for
userspace to find out beforehand if alarms are supported.

A system without an IRQ for the RTC before this patch:
[root@...alhost ~]# cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
[root@...alhost ~]#

After this patch:
[root@...alhost ~]# cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
cat: /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm: No such file or directory
[root@...alhost ~]#

This fixes gnome-session + systemd trying to use suspend-then-hibernate,
which causes systemd to abort the suspend when writing the RTC alarm fails.

BugLink: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9988
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index df0c5776d49b..a5a19ff10535 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int cmos_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
 	struct cmos_rtc	*cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	unsigned char	rtc_control;
 
+	/* This not only a rtc_op, but also called directly */
 	if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq))
 		return -EIO;
 
@@ -452,6 +453,7 @@ static int cmos_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
 	unsigned char mon, mday, hrs, min, sec, rtc_control;
 	int ret;
 
+	/* This not only a rtc_op, but also called directly */
 	if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq))
 		return -EIO;
 
@@ -516,9 +518,6 @@ static int cmos_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
 	struct cmos_rtc	*cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	unsigned long	flags;
 
-	if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
 
 	if (enabled)
@@ -579,6 +578,12 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops cmos_rtc_ops = {
 	.alarm_irq_enable	= cmos_alarm_irq_enable,
 };
 
+static const struct rtc_class_ops cmos_rtc_ops_no_alarm = {
+	.read_time		= cmos_read_time,
+	.set_time		= cmos_set_time,
+	.proc			= cmos_procfs,
+};
+
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
 /*
@@ -855,9 +860,12 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *ports, int rtc_irq)
 			dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ %d is already in use\n", rtc_irq);
 			goto cleanup1;
 		}
+
+		cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops;
+	} else {
+		cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops_no_alarm;
 	}
 
-	cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops;
 	cmos_rtc.rtc->nvram_old_abi = true;
 	retval = rtc_register_device(cmos_rtc.rtc);
 	if (retval)
-- 
2.17.1