linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 033/110] bfs: add sanity check at bfs_fill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:07:22 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tigran@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        syzbot <syzbot+71c6b5d68e91149fc8a4@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, willy@...radead.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 033/110] bfs: add sanity check at bfs_fill_super()

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Yes, of course I object to it. I ignored this version of the patch
> being applied to the older Linux versions, but for the latest versions
> surely the version that I have authored should be applied instead. I
> have sent to Andrew Morton both the 4.20-rc1 and 4.19.2 versions of
> the patch. The 4.20 was applied (as "linux-next", I don't know why it
> is not in 4.20-rc4 yet), but 4.19.2 version was not applied yet, so
> here it is attached again (with the proper changelog etc). It applies
> to 4.19.5 cleanly as well, so please use this version (attached).

I can not apply a patch to the stable trees that are not in Linus's tree
first.  So there's nothing I can do here with this.

Until then, I'll take the patch that is already in Linus's tree, which
is what I did here, thanks.

greg k-h