lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:18:43 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 14/83] ARM: make lookup_processor_type() non-__init

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:15:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:28:18PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > As I've already fed back to Sascha about this, this patch on its own
> > does not fix anything, and is not a stable kernel candidate without
> > a patch that makes use of it (iow, the spectre fixes.)  It is a
> > preparatory patch for mainline commit 383fb3ee8024.
> > 
> > Every commit in:
> > 
> > $ git rev-list v4.16..383fb3ee8024
> > 
> > are the ARM spectre fixes, which are being back-ported by David Long.
> > 
> > Please do not cherry-pick commits from within this series for _any_
> > stable kernel, but please wait for David to send you the back-ported
> > patches.
> 
> Ugh, ok, that's a bunch here.

Ok, not that bad, only 4:
	383fb3ee8024 ("ARM: spectre-v2: per-CPU vtables to work around big.Little systems")
	e209950fdd06 ("ARM: add PROC_VTABLE and PROC_TABLE macros")
	945aceb1db88 ("ARM: clean up per-processor check_bugs method call")
	899a42f83667 ("ARM: make lookup_processor_type() non-__init")

I'll go drop them all from the trees now.  Turns out for 4.14 one of
these patches broke the build anyway.  Sasha, how did that past your
builder tests?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ