linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 142/142] bpf: fix off-by-one error in adjust_subprog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:00:27 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+4fc427c7af994b0948be@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 142/142] bpf: fix off-by-one error in adjust_subprog_starts

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>

commit afd594240806acc138cf696c09f2f4829d55d02f upstream.

When patching in a new sequence for the first insn of a subprog, the start
 of that subprog does not change (it's the first insn of the sequence), so
 adjust_subprog_starts should check start <= off (rather than < off).
Also added a test to test_verifier.c (it's essentially the syz reproducer).

Fixes: cc8b0b92a169 ("bpf: introduce function calls (function boundaries)")
Reported-by: syzbot+4fc427c7af994b0948be@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                       |    2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5283,7 +5283,7 @@ static void adjust_subprog_starts(struct
 		return;
 	/* NOTE: fake 'exit' subprog should be updated as well. */
 	for (i = 0; i <= env->subprog_cnt; i++) {
-		if (env->subprog_info[i].start < off)
+		if (env->subprog_info[i].start <= off)
 			continue;
 		env->subprog_info[i].start += len - 1;
 	}
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -12511,6 +12511,25 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 		.result = ACCEPT,
 	},
+	{
+		"calls: ctx read at start of subprog",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 5),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+		.errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only",
+		.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+	},
 };
 
 static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)