linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/142] 4.19.10-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:12:30 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/142] 4.19.10-stable review

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:56:32AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:11:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:01:02AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:58:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.10 release.
> > > > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:57:12 UTC 2018.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > Regressions detected.
> > 
> > They were?
> 
> My mistake. There were some false regressions that showed up and I was a
> bit distracted when sending the reports and missed that.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Ok, good, thanks for confirming, I was confused :)

greg k-h