linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Return -EINVAL for the sys files for unopened channels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 18:00:29 +0000
From:   Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC:     "'gregkh@...uxfoundation.org'" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "'devel@...uxdriverproject.org'" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        "'olaf@...fle.de'" <olaf@...fle.de>,
        "'jasowang@...hat.com'" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
        "'apw@...onical.com'" <apw@...onical.com>,
        vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Return -EINVAL for the sys files for
 unopened channels

> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:35:43 +0000
> Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> 
> > Before 98f4c651762c, we returned zeros for unopened channels.
> > With 98f4c651762c, we started to return random on-stack values.
> >
> > We'd better return -EINVAL instead.
> 
> The concept looks fine, but maybe it would be simpler to move it into
> hv_ringbuffer_get_debuginfo and have it return an error code.
> 
> Since so much of the code is repeated, I would probably make a
> macro which generates the code as well.
> 
> Something like this:

Thanks, Stephen! Now the patch has been in char-misc's char-misc-linus
branch, so IMO we may as well leave it as is (considering the code here is
unlikely to be frqeuencly changed), and we have a smaller patch this way. :-)

But, yes, I agree with you that generally we should make a common
function to avoid duplicate code.

Thanks,
-- Dexuan