linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] libnvdimm for 4.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Dec 2018 10:04:59 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] libnvdimm for 4.21

On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 7:36 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev
<konstantin@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 09:57:28PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Hmm.
> >
> > This pull request doesn't seem to have gotten an automatic pr-tracker
> > reply, even though I pulled it, and even though it was cc'd to lkml.
> >
> > Konstantin, any idea why the automation didn't trigger? I'm not seeing
> > anything all that odd about it.
>
> As you've noticed, it's not on lore, and it's also not on any other LKML
> archive out there (I've checked lkml.org, lkml.iu.edu, marc.info). So,
> I'm not sure precisely what happened, but it would appear that despite
> the CC in the headers, the mail never actually passed vger.
>
> > Does lkml hate Dan?

I suspect this is the case, or more specifically this is likely one of
those times where vger needed to put the Intel mail servers in a
time-out for bouncing too many mails.