linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] binderfs: reserve devices for initial mount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:18:18 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc:     tkjos@...roid.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com,
        dan.carpenter@...cle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, maco@...roid.com,
        tkjos@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] binderfs: reserve devices for initial mount

On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 12:32:19PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> The binderfs instance in the initial ipc namespace will always have a
> reserve of 4 binder devices unless explicitly capped by specifying a lower
> value via the "max" mount option.
> This ensures when binder devices are removed (on accident or on purpose)
> they can always be recreated without risking that all minor numbers have
> already been used up.
> 
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - patch unchanged
> v1:
> - patch introduced
> v0:
> - patch not present
> ---
>  drivers/android/binderfs.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

What did you make this patch against?  It doesn't apply cleanly so I
don't want to take it until we get everything synced up properly
together :(

I'll apply patch 1/2 now, can you rebase and resend this one?

thanks,

greg k-h