lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:36:45 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the clk tree

On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 10:41 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 09:37:26AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Do you have a patch for checkpatch too? Maybe Joe can solve my problem.
> Joe posted a checkpatch diff in another thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/40bfc40958fca6e2cc9b86101153aa0715fac4f7.camel@perches.com/

That proposal has the negative that a Fixes: line
is often after a Signed-off-by: line and the test
does not validate Fixes lines after Signed-off-by:s.

I would still appreciate some external testing of
the proposed patch.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ