linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: tqmx86: IO controller with i2c, wachdog and gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:27 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Emeric Dupont <emeric.dupont@....aero>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: tqmx86: IO controller with i2c, wachdog and gpio

> > Hi Lee
> > 
> > I posted a new version.
> > 
> > Your email indicates you are using Mutt:
> > 
> > >User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
> > 
> > Which is also what i use. I've never had issues with signatures like
> > this. I also cannot find any documentation as to how you configure
> > mutt remove signatures. How are you doing it?
> 
> I think it's automatic.  I certainly didn't set that up.

Interesting. My mutt installation does not do this. I trim emails
manually to be netiquette compliant.

> Try replying to your own mail.  I should automatically cut.

Replying to my patch works fine. It does not cut the patch.

This is a bug somewhere, since the marker i used is not a signature
marker. It did not have the space on the end.

Anyway, getting the patch reviewed is more important to me than
tracing down the bug...

	 Andrew