linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Introduce per-console loglevel setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Mar 2019 12:10:32 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Introduce per-console loglevel setting

On (03/01/19 16:48), Calvin Owens wrote:
[..]
>  		msg = log_from_idx(console_idx);
> -		if (suppress_message_printing(msg->level)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * Skip record we have buffered and already printed
> -			 * directly to the console when we received it, and
> -			 * record that has level above the console loglevel.
> -			 */
> -			console_idx = log_next(console_idx);
> -			console_seq++;
> -			goto skip;
> -		}
>  
>  		/* Output to all consoles once old messages replayed. */
>  		if (unlikely(exclusive_console &&
> @@ -2405,7 +2402,7 @@ void console_unlock(void)
>  		console_lock_spinning_enable();
>  
>  		stop_critical_timings();	/* don't trace print latency */
> -		call_console_drivers(ext_text, ext_len, text, len);
> +		call_console_drivers(ext_text, ext_len, text, len, msg->level);
>  		start_critical_timings();

So it seems that now we always format the text and ext message (if
needed) and only then check if there is at least one console we can
print that message on.

Can we iterate the consoles first and check if msg is worth
the effort (per console suppress_message_printing()) and only
if it is do all the formatting and call console drivers?

	-ss