linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] edac: sifive: Add EDAC driver for SiFive FU540-C000 chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:57:37 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc:     Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, palmer@...ive.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, mchehab@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sachin.ghadi@...ive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] edac: sifive: Add EDAC driver for SiFive FU540-C000
 chip

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 05:23:27PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG))
> > +		return;
> 
> Can all of these debugfs functions be wrapped with an #if ... #endif such 
> that, if CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG is not set, they will all be stripped out by 
> the preprocessor?

Why would you make the code more ugly with ifdeffery?

Do you have any serious code size constraints so that you absolutely
need to remove a couple of KBs?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.