linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: dts: rockchip: Add rk3288-veyron-jerry rev 10-15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:25:20 +0100
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     mka@...omium.org, ryandcase@...omium.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Alexis Ballier <aballier@...too.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Akash Gajjar <Akash_Gajjar@...tor.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: dts: rockchip: Add rk3288-veyron-jerry rev 10-15

Am Freitag, 22. März 2019, 20:59:23 CET schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> As far as I can tell/remember rev10 was originally created to support
> making a SKU of jerry that had a different LCD.  rev11-rev15 were
> added to give some wiggle room for future builds.  Downstream has a
> separate device tree for rev10-rev15 (compared to rev3-rev7) with the
> expectation that differences relating to the LCD would be accounted
> for there but nothing was ever added to the rev10-rev15 making it
> identical to the rev3-rev7 one.
> 
> It's likely nothing actually shipped with rev10-rev15 but they are
> listed in the downstream kernel's device tree and it seems like it
> should add a little safety if we match them here just in case
> something actually shipped with one of these revisions and that device
> will break if we don't claim support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

applied both for 5.2

Thanks
Heiko