linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] spi: Add Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 22:47:39 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:     masonccyang@...c.com.tw
Cc:     bbrezillon@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, juliensu@...c.com.tw,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        marek.vasut@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        zhengxunli@...c.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] spi: Add Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI controller
 driver

On 04/09/2019 02:20 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> [...]
>>>>>> +   ret = rpc_spi_set_freq(rpc, desc->mem->spi->max_speed_hz);
>>>>>> +   if (ret)
>>>>>> +      return ret;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +   rpc_spi_mem_set_prep_op_cfg(desc->mem->spi,
>>>>>> +                &desc->info.op_tmpl, &offs, &len);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +   regmap_update_bits(rpc->regmap, RPC_CMNCR, RPC_CMNCR_MD, 0);
>>>>>> +   regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DRCR, RPC_DRCR_RBURST(32) |
>>>>>> +           RPC_DRCR_RBE);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +   regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DRCMR, rpc->cmd);
>>>>>> +   regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DREAR, RPC_DREAR_EAC(1));
>>>>>
>>>>>    So you're not even trying to support flashes larger than the
>>> read dirmap?
>>>>> Now I don't think it's acceptable (and I have rewritten this code
>>> internally).
>>>>
>>>> what about the size comes form mtd->size ?
>>>
>>>    I'm not talking about size here; we should use the full address.
>>> I'm attaching
>>> my patch...
>>
>> okay,got it!
>> what about just
>> -      regmap_write(rpc->mfd->regmap, RPC_DREAR, RPC_DREAR_EAC(1));
>> +      regmap_write(rpc->mfd->regmap, RPC_DREAR,
>> +                   RPC_DREAR_EAV(offs >> 25) | RPC_DREAR_EAC(1));
>>
>> because only > 64MByte size make RPC_DREAR_EAV() work.
> 
>    Seems OK now, after Boris' reply.

   Well, actually not. The 'len' check in the beginning is oversimplified.
Attached is the patch fixing up the dirmap read path (and making it handle
flashes > 64 MiB as well)...

>> thanks & best regards,
>> Mason
> 
> [...]

MBR, Sergei

View attachment "spi-renesas-rpc-fix-dirmap-read.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2318 bytes)