linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mlx5-next tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 06:53:06 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mlx5-next tree with Linus' tree

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:19:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mlx5-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   include/linux/mlx5/eswitch.h
>
> between commit:
>
>   02f3afd97556 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Correct type to u16 for vport_num and int for vport_index")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   82b11f071936 ("net/mlx5: Expose eswitch encap mode")
>
> from the mlx5-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>

Thanks