linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:59:35 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:00:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> mm/util.c: In function '__account_locked_vm':
> mm/util.c:372:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_assert_held_exclusive'; did you mean 'lockdep_assert_held_once'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&mm->mmap_sem);
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   lockdep_assert_held_once
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   610509219f27 ("mm-add-account_locked_vm-utility-function-v3")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   9ffbe8ac05db ("locking/lockdep: Rename lockdep_assert_held_exclusive() -> lockdep_assert_held_write()")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I have applied the following merge fix patch.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ int __account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, bool inc,
>  	unsigned long locked_vm, limit;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  
>  	locked_vm = mm->locked_vm;
>  	if (inc) {

OK, thanks, I'll stage mm-add-account_locked_vm-utility-function.patch
behind linux-next and shall fix this up.