linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48264d1c-7669-845f-ce09-58663588410b@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:07:54 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of
 IS_ENABLED macro


Hi Rafael,

On 24/06/2019 11:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:53 AM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Viresh,
>>
>> On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED
>>> is trying to avoid.
>>>
>>> Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>>
>> what about this one?
> 
> Care to respond to my question regarding this one in the first place, please?

Ah yes, sorry, I missed your email.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog