linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU phandle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:32:14 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU
 phandle

Hi Mathieu,

On 6/26/2019 11:11 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Sai,
> 
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 21:36, Sai Prakash Ranjan
> <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> index 3c5ceda8db24..4990da2c13e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> @@ -159,16 +159,16 @@ static int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device *dev)
>>          struct device_node *dn;
>>
>>          if (!dev->of_node)
>> -               return 0;
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>> +
>>          dn = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "cpu", 0);
>> -       /* Affinity defaults to CPU0 */
>>          if (!dn)
>> -               return 0;
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>> +
>>          cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(dn);
>>          of_node_put(dn);
>>
>> -       /* Affinity to CPU0 if no cpu nodes are found */
>> -       return (cpu < 0) ? 0 : cpu;
>> +       return cpu;
>>   }
> 
> Function of_coresight_get_cpu() needs to return -ENODEV rather than 0
> when !CONFIG_OF
> 
>>
>>   /*
>> @@ -734,14 +734,14 @@ static int acpi_coresight_get_cpu(struct device *dev)
>>          struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
>>
>>          if (!adev)
>> -               return 0;
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>>          status = acpi_get_parent(adev->handle, &cpu_handle);
>>          if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> -               return 0;
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>>
>>          cpu = acpi_handle_to_logical_cpuid(cpu_handle);
>>          if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>> -               return 0;
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>>          return cpu;
>>   }
>>
> 
> Same as above, but for !CONFIG_ACPI
> 

Have fixed and resent, thanks Mathieu.

-Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation