lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:00:25 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the block tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:52:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the cgroup tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.txt
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   8060c47ba853 ("block: rename CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP to CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG")
> 
> from the block tree and commit:
> 
>   99c8b231ae6c ("docs: cgroup-v1: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst")
> 
> from the cgroup tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.txt
> index f02163fabf80,b2265cf6c9c3..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.txt
> @@@ -537,10 -537,10 +537,10 @@@ or io.bfq.weight
>   
>   As for cgroups-v1 (blkio controller), the exact set of stat files
>   created, and kept up-to-date by bfq, depends on whether
>  -CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP is set. If it is set, then bfq creates all
>  +CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG is set. If it is set, then bfq creates all
>   the stat files documented in
> - Documentation/cgroup-v1/blkio-controller.txt. If, instead,
> + Documentation/cgroup-v1/blkio-controller.rst. If, instead,
>  -CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP is not set, then bfq creates only the files
>  +CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG is not set, then bfq creates only the files
>   blkio.bfq.io_service_bytes
>   blkio.bfq.io_service_bytes_recursive
>   blkio.bfq.io_serviced

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ