linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/413] 5.2.3-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:34:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/413] 5.2.3-stable review

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:16:19PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 21:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> > There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri 26 Jul 2019 07:13:35 PM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.3-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.2.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected.
> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 5.2.3-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-5.2.y
> git commit: db628fe0e67ff8c66e8c6ba76e5e4becfa75fe21
> git describe: v5.2.2-414-gdb628fe0e67f
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.2-oe/build/v5.2.2-414-gdb628fe0e67f
> 
> Regressions (compared to build v5.2.2)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> x86:
>   kvm-unit-tests:
>     * vmx
> 
> 
> TESTNAME=vmx TIMEOUT=90s ACCEL= ./x86/run x86/vmx.flat -smp 1 -cpu
> host,+vmx -append \"-exit_monitor_from_l2_test -ept_access* -vmx_smp*
> -vmx_vmcs_shadow_test\"
> [  155.670748] kvm [6062]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0x4050cb
> kvm_set_msr_common: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x1, nop
> [  155.681027] kvm [6062]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0x408911
> kvm_set_msr_common: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x3, nop
> [  155.690749] kvm [6062]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0x40bb39
> kvm_set_msr_common: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x1, nop
> [  155.700595] kvm [6062]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0x4089b2
> kvm_set_msr_common: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x3, nop
> [  158.349308] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.363737] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.378010] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.392480] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.406920] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.421390] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.435795] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.450276] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.464674] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  158.479030] nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
> [  161.044379] set kvm_intel.dump_invalid_vmcs=1 to dump internal KVM state.
> FAIL vmx (timeout; duration=90s)
> 
> kernel-config: http://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/lkft/sumo/intel-corei7-64/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.2/14/config
> Full log: https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/836289#L1597

Ick.

Any chance you can run 'git bisect' to find the offending patch?  Or
just try reverting a few, you can ignore the ppc ones, so that only
leaves you 7 different commits.

Does this same test pass in 5.3-rc1?

thanks,

greg k-h