lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 22:45:01 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: uniphier: Separate modem group from UART
 ctsrts group

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:29 PM Kunihiko Hayashi
<hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> It depends on the board implementation whether to have each pins of
> CTS/RTS, and others for modem. So it is necessary to divide current
> uart_ctsrts group into uart_ctsrts and uart_modem groups.
>
> Since the number of implemented pins for modem differs depending
> on SoC, each uart_modem group also has a different number of pins.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> ---

> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c b/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c
> index 414ff3a..d1ed5b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c
> @@ -780,8 +780,10 @@ static const unsigned system_bus_cs5_pins[] = {55};
>  static const int system_bus_cs5_muxvals[] = {6};
>  static const unsigned uart0_pins[] = {135, 136};
>  static const int uart0_muxvals[] = {3, 3};
> -static const unsigned uart0_ctsrts_pins[] = {137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 124};
> -static const int uart0_ctsrts_muxvals[] = {3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3};
> +static const unsigned uart0_ctsrts_pins[] = {137, 139};
> +static const int uart0_ctsrts_muxvals[] = {3, 3};
> +static const unsigned uart0_modem_pins[] = {138, 140, 141, 124};

Please sort this array
while you are here.

Otherwise, looks good to me.






--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ