linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:14:11 +0200
From:   Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node

  Hi,

> > Changing the order doesn't look hard.  Patch attached (untested, have no
> > test hardware).  But maybe I missed some detail ...
> 
> I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary the GEM
> object can be initialized in between. I think that's slightly more
> flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.

Yes, that should work too.

Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>

cheers,
  Gerd