lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:26:08 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To:     Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Pointer magic in mm_init_cpumask()

On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 09:13 -0400, Siarhei Liakh wrote:

> If mm_cpumask() is not safe, then at the very least the following has
> to be fixed:
> $ grep -rIn 'cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(' *
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/tlb.h:69:    cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c:857:        cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
> arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:92:        cpumask_clear(mm_cpuma
> sk(mm));
> arch/csky/mm/asid.c:126:    cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
> arch/arm/mm/context.c:233:    cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
> 
> Otherwise, mm_init_cpumask() can be simplified down to
> cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm)).
> What do you think?

That looks like a nice cleanup.

I do not see why it would not work, but I suppose
that should be tested :)

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ