linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] backlight: pwm_bl: fix cie1913 comments and constant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:36:50 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] backlight: pwm_bl: fix cie1913 comments and constant

On 20/09/2019 12.14, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Hi Rasmus
> 
> Has something gone wrong with the mail out for this patch set. I didn't
> get a covering letter or patch 5/5?

Sorry about that. I should have included a cover letter so you'd know
that patch 5 wasn't directly related to the other patches.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190919140620.32407-5-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk/

I was removing the now unused int_pow() function, but Andy has told me
there are new users in -next, so it's moot. Only the first four patches
are relevant.

Thanks,
Rasmus