linux-kernel - Re: Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:31:25 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
        Anatol Pomazau <anatol@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <willdeacon@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        stern@...land.harvard.edu, akiyks@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, dlustig@...dia.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
        luc.maranget@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN)

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:18:57PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi,

> We would like to share a new data-race detector for the Linux kernel:
> Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN) --
> https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/KCSAN  (Details:
> https://github.com/google/ktsan/blob/kcsan/Documentation/dev-tools/kcsan.rst)

Nice!

BTW kcsan_atomic_next() is missing a stub definition in <linux/kcsan.h>
when !CONFIG_KCSAN:

https://github.com/google/ktsan/commit/a22a093a0f0d0b582c82cdbac4f133a3f61d207c#diff-19d7c475b4b92aab8ba440415ab786ec

... and I think the kcsan_{begin,end}_atomic() stubs need to be static
inline too.

It looks like this is easy enough to enable on arm64, with the only real
special case being secondary_start_kernel() which we might want to
refactor to allow some portions to be instrumented.

I pushed the trivial patches I needed to get arm64 booting to my arm64/kcsan
branch:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64/kcsan

We have some interesting splats at boot time in stop_machine, which
don't seem to have been hit/fixed on x86 yet in the kcsan-with-fixes
branch, e.g.

[    0.237939] ==================================================================
[    0.239431] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in multi_cpu_stop+0xa8/0x198 and set_state+0x80/0xb0
[    0.241189] 
[    0.241606] write to 0xffff00001003bd00 of 4 bytes by task 24 on cpu 3:
[    0.243435]  set_state+0x80/0xb0
[    0.244328]  multi_cpu_stop+0x16c/0x198
[    0.245406]  cpu_stopper_thread+0x170/0x298
[    0.246565]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x40c/0x560
[    0.247696]  kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[    0.248586]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[    0.249589] 
[    0.250006] read to 0xffff00001003bd00 of 4 bytes by task 14 on cpu 1:
[    0.251804]  multi_cpu_stop+0xa8/0x198
[    0.252851]  cpu_stopper_thread+0x170/0x298
[    0.254008]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x40c/0x560
[    0.255135]  kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[    0.256027]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[    0.257036] 
[    0.257449] Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
[    0.258918] CPU: 1 PID: 14 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 5.3.0-00007-g67ab35a199f4-dirty #3
[    0.261241] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.262517] ==================================================================

> To those of you who we mentioned at LPC that we're working on a
> watchpoint-based KTSAN inspired by DataCollider [1], this is it (we
> renamed it to KCSAN to avoid confusion with KTSAN).
> [1] http://usenix.org/legacy/events/osdi10/tech/full_papers/Erickson.pdf
> 
> In the coming weeks we're planning to:
> * Set up a syzkaller instance.
> * Share the dashboard so that you can see the races that are found.
> * Attempt to send fixes for some races upstream (if you find that the
> kcsan-with-fixes branch contains an important fix, please feel free to
> point it out and we'll prioritize that).
> 
> There are a few open questions:
> * The big one: most of the reported races are due to unmarked
> accesses; prioritization or pruning of races to focus initial efforts
> to fix races might be required. Comments on how best to proceed are
> welcome. We're aware that these are issues that have recently received
> attention in the context of the LKMM
> (https://lwn.net/Articles/793253/).

I think the big risk here is drive-by "fixes" masking the warnings
rather than fixing the actual issue. It's easy for people to suppress a
warning with {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), so they're liable to do that even the
resulting race isn't benign.

I don't have a clue how to prevent that, though.

> * How/when to upstream KCSAN?

I would love to see this soon!

Thanks,
Mark.