linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serdev: Add ACPI devices by ResourceSource field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 22:15:10 +0200
From:   Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serdev: Add ACPI devices by ResourceSource field

Hi,

On 9/20/19 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Also I will give this a test-run on some of the existing devices
> which rely on the instantiation of serdev devices for ACPI
> devices which are childs of the uart device.

Thank you for testing! Will get to your other mail shortly.

> Given the above I think you may want to also limit your patch to
> only instantiate a "struct device" for the first UARTSerialBusV2
> in an ACPI "Device()"'s  .

Right, I will change this for a v2 once the issue revealed by your
testing has been resolved.

> I hope this sheds some clarity on the (muddy) situation wrt
> I2cSerialBusV2 handling.

Thank you again, this has definitely helped clear things up for me and
your write-up is much appreciated!

Maximilian