linux-kernel - Re: [v2 0/3] Fix issues reported by Coccinelle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 22 Sep 2019 22:39:06 +0530
From:   Saiyam Doshi <saiyamdoshi.in@...il.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Markus.Elfring@....de
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 0/3] Fix issues reported by Coccinelle

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:14:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:10:45PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > Using cocciecheck to ensure there are no semantic issues in
> > > i2c-qup driver.
> > 
> > * This wording contains a typo.
> 
> Doesn't matter to me for a cover letter as long as we can understand it.
> 
> > * I would prefer to refer to a desired reduction of a few
> >   source code quality concerns.
> 
> Not needed. I understand what is going on here.

Markus - By "ensure", I mean there are no further cocciecheck issues at this
point in time. And further, what changed is covered in individual patch
changelog. So, I think this information is fine in cover.

> > Can such a prefix be omitted?
Can be, but I like to keep it.

Thanks for review.

-Saiyam