lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 23:12:04 +0530
From:   Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Naveen Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 7/8] tracing/probe: Reject exactly same probe
 event

> > I think we need something like this:
> > 
> > 	list_for_each_entry(pos, &tpe->probes, list) {
> > 		orig = container_of(pos, struct trace_kprobe, tp);
> > 		if (strcmp(trace_kprobe_symbol(orig),
> > 			   trace_kprobe_symbol(comp)) ||
> > 		    trace_kprobe_offset(orig) != trace_kprobe_offset(comp))
> > 			continue;
> > 
> > 		/*
> > 		 * trace_probe_compare_arg_type() ensured that nr_args and
> > 		 * each argument name and type are same. Let's compare comm.
> > 		 */
> > 		for (i = 0; i < orig->tp.nr_args; i++) {
> > 			if (strcmp(orig->tp.args[i].comm,
> > 				   comp->tp.args[i].comm))
> > 				goto outer_loop;
> > 
> > 		}
> > 
> > 		return true;
> > outer_loop:
> > 	}
> 
> Correct, that's what I intended.
> Could you make a fix patch on top of it? (or do I?)
> 
> Thank you,

Either way is fine. I can send out a patch tomorrow. But fine if you beat
me to it.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ