linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 32/73] libperf: Move page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:17:44 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/73] libperf: Move page_size into libperf

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:10:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:23:14PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > We need page_size in libperf, so moving it in there.
> > Adding libperf_init as a global libperf init functon.
> > 
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-g6auuaej31nsusuevuhcgxli@git.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/lib/core.c                 | 7 +++++++
> >  tools/perf/lib/include/internal/lib.h | 2 ++
> >  tools/perf/lib/include/perf/core.h    | 1 +
> >  tools/perf/lib/lib.c                  | 2 ++
> >  tools/perf/lib/libperf.map            | 1 +
> >  tools/perf/perf.c                     | 4 ++--
> >  tools/perf/util/util.h                | 2 --
> 
> you forgot to remove it from tools/perf/util/util.c, I did it, and also
> added internal/lib.h to the places that use page_size, after this I'll
> remove that include from util/util.h, that header has to die :-)

ah right.. linker wouldn't fail because it's variable,
so there's no conflict..

thanks,
jirka