linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SC7180

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:16:28 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SC7180

Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-09 02:19:39)
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On 10/5/2019 4:50 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-04 10:39:31)
> >>
> >> Could you please confirm if you are referring to update the below?
> > 
> > I wasn't suggesting that explicitly but sure. Something like this would
> > be necessary to make clk_get() pass back a NULL pointer to the caller.
> > Does everything keep working with this change?
> > 
> 
> Even if I pass back NULL, I don't see it working. Please suggest how to 
> take it forward.
> 

Why doesn't it work?