lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:04:42 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] usb: gadget: add raw-gadget interface

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:38 PM Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>
> > USB Raw Gadget is a kernel module that provides a userspace interface for
> > the USB Gadget subsystem. Essentially it allows to emulate USB devices
> > from userspace. Enabled with CONFIG_USB_RAW_GADGET. Raw Gadget is
> > currently a strictly debugging feature and shouldn't be used in
> > production.
> >
> > Raw Gadget is similar to GadgetFS, but provides a more low-level and
> > direct access to the USB Gadget layer for the userspace. The key
> > differences are:
> >
> > 1. Every USB request is passed to the userspace to get a response, while
> >    GadgetFS responds to some USB requests internally based on the provided
> >    descriptors. However note, that the UDC driver might respond to some
> >    requests on its own and never forward them to the Gadget layer.
> >
> > 2. GadgetFS performs some sanity checks on the provided USB descriptors,
> >    while Raw Gadget allows you to provide arbitrary data as responses to
> >    USB requests.
> >
> > 3. Raw Gadget provides a way to select a UDC device/driver to bind to,
> >    while GadgetFS currently binds to the first available UDC.
> >
> > 4. Raw Gadget uses predictable endpoint names (handles) across different
> >    UDCs (as long as UDCs have enough endpoints of each required transfer
> >    type).
> >
> > 5. Raw Gadget has ioctl-based interface instead of a filesystem-based one.
>
> ...
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/usb/raw-gadget.rst
>
> > +Userspace interface
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +
> > +To create a Raw Gadget instance open /sys/kernel/debug/usb/raw-gadget
> > +(debugfs should be enabled and mounted). Multiple raw-gadget instances
>
> Looks like the documentation hasn't kept up with the more recent
> changes to the driver.

Right, will fix in v3, thanks!

>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/raw.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1057 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * USB Raw Gadget driver.
> > + * See Documentation/usb/raw-gadget.rst for more details.
> > + *
> > + * Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "raw: %s: " fmt, __func__
>
> This macro isn't used anywhere now.

It's used internally by pr_debug(). I didn't remove all of the
debugging messages, I've left the ones that are printed in cases or
errors, since ftrace might not always help to distinguish between some
of those.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ