linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: memcg: switch to css_tryget() in get_mem_cgroup_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:45:10 -0800
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: memcg: switch to css_tryget() in
 get_mem_cgroup_from_mm()

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I am sorry but I do not follow. How can css_tryget_online provide the
> same semantic when the css can go offline right after the tryget call
> returns so it is effectivelly undistinguishable from the case when the
> css was already online before the call was made. Or is my understanding
> of what Roman's said earlier in the thread?

It's *exactly* the same semantics as opening a file and deleting it
and keeping using it vs. deleting a file and then trying to open it.
You can't give out a new reference when the entity's visibility is
expected to be gone already and that's the exactly the condition that
tryget_online avoids.  I don't know how to better explain it if the
file analogy doesn't work.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun