linux-kernel - Re: KCSAN: data-race in __alloc_file / __alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:56:29 +0000
From:   Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+3ef049d50587836c0606@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: KCSAN: data-race in __alloc_file / __alloc_file

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 09:36:41AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:23 AM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. I thought we already then applied all the patches that marked
> > things that didn't use f_pos as FMODE_STREAM. Including pipes and
> > sockets etc.
> >
> > But if we didn't - and no, I didn't double-check now either - then
> > obviously that part of the patch can't be applied now.
> 
> Ok, looking at it now.
> 
> Yeah, commit c5bf68fe0c86 ("*: convert stream-like files from
> nonseekable_open -> stream_open") did the scripted thing, but it only
> did it for nonseekable_open, not for the more complicated cases.
> 
> So yup, you're right - we'd need to at least do the pipe/socket case too.
> 
> What happens if the actual conversion part (nonseekable_open ->
> stream_open) is removed from the cocci script, and it's used to only
> find "read/write doesn't use f_pos" cases?
> 
> Or maybe trigger on '.llseek = no_llseek'?

( just a quick update that I'm still pending on this. I've tried to
  quickly check the above this evening but offhand it does not give good
  results until stream_open.cocci is extended to understand
  read_iter/writer_iter and properly worked some more on it.
  Or maybe I'm just too sleepy...

  I'd like to take a time break for now.
  I will try to return to this topic after finishing my main work first.
  I apologize for the inconvenience. )