linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document compatibles for Ux500 boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:43:08 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document compatibles for Ux500 boards

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:10 PM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:22:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:20 PM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net> wrote:
> >
> > > The device-specific compatible values used by the Ux500 boards
> > > were not documented so far. Add a new simple schema to document them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> >
> > Nice, thanks!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> >
> > I expect Rob to merge these patches as they are bindings-only,
> > alternatively I can take them in the Ux500 DTS pull request
> > for the next kernel cycle.
> >
>
> For this patch it would be easier if you take it through the Ux500 tree,
> as I have another patch series that adds a new board to it.

OK I applied it for v5.6 on my ux500-dts branch.

> The vendor-prefix patches are independent, so Rob can merge them if that
> is easier?

Let's see if Rob wants to take them, else I will merge them as well.

Yours,
Linus Walleij