linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Delete obsolete magic constants from documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:08:44 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Pascal Terjan <pterjan@...gle.com>
Cc:     Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>,
        Harry Wei <harryxiyou@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete obsolete magic constants from documentation

On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:15:36 +0000
Pascal Terjan <pterjan@...gle.com> wrote:

> Those no longer appear in the code.
> I have some more patches to cleanup some of them from the code but this
> is an easy first step.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pascal Terjan <pterjan@...gle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/magic-number.rst        | 44 -------------------
>  .../it_IT/process/magic-number.rst            | 44 -------------------
>  .../zh_CN/process/magic-number.rst            | 44 -------------------
>  3 files changed, 132 deletions(-)

So I absolutely love this patch; we really need to clean this kind of
cruft out of the docs.

Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to docs-next; did you prepare it against
linux-next, perhaps?  Is there any chance I could get a version against
docs-next?

If you're up for further work on this file, it would be nice to get rid of
the 2.x "changelog" text at the beginning; I don't think that has any real
value now.

Thanks,

jon