linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] docs, parallelism: Rearrange how jobserver reservations are made

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:39:32 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] docs, parallelism: Rearrange how jobserver
 reservations are made

On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:59:26 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> v2:
>     - correct comments and commit logs (rasmus)
>     - handle non-parallel mode more cleanly (rasmus)
>     - reserve slots 8 at a time (rasmus)
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191121000304.48829-1-keescook@chromium.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As Rasmus noted[1], there were some deficiencies in how the Make jobserver
> vs sphinx parallelism logic was handled. This series attempts to address
> all those problems by building a set of wrappers and fixing some of the
> internal logic.
> 
> Thank you Rasmus for the suggestions (and the "jobhog" example)! :)

OK, I have applied this set for 5.5.

I do worry that this all looks a little complex and fragile.  I wonder if
there's a way that we could set up some sort of dependency chain that
would just tell make not to run the docs builds in parallel with anything
else?  That is more-or-less the effect of what we're doing anyway.

Meanwhile, though, this seems to work, so let's go with it :)

Thanks,

jon