linux-kernel - Re: perf top for arm64?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:48:25 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, will@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        "linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf top for arm64?

Em Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 05:36:55PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 04:13:49PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I find to my surprise that "perf top" does not work for arm64:
> > 
> > root@...ntu:/home/john/linux# tools/perf/perf top
> > Couldn't read the cpuid for this machine: No such file or directory
> 
> there was recent change that check on cpuid and quits:
>   608127f73779 perf top: Initialize perf_env->cpuid, needed by the per arch annotation init routine
> 
> Arnaldo,
> maybe this should be just a warning/info, because it seems to be related
> to annotations only..?

Right, my bad, I'll look into making this just a debug message and then
check in the annotation code when this is really needed to show an
error/popup window :-\

- Arnaldo
 
> get_cpuid is defined only for s390/x86/powerpc, so I guess it won't work
> on the rest as well
> 
> jirka
> 
> > 
> > That's v5.5-rc1 release.
> > 
> > It seems that we are just missing an arm64 version of get_cpuid() - with the
> > patch below, I now get as hoped:
> > 
> >    PerfTop:   32857 irqs/sec  kernel:85.0%  exact:  0.0% lost: 0/0 drop: 0/0
> > [4000Hz cycles],  (all, 64 CPUs)
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >      8.99%  [kernel]          [k] arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist
> >      5.80%  [kernel]          [k] __softirqentry_text_start
> >      4.49%  [kernel]          [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
> >      3.48%  [kernel]          [k] el0_svc_common.constprop.2
> >      3.37%  [kernel]          [k] _raw_write_lock_irqsave
> >      3.28%  [kernel]          [k] __local_bh_enable_ip
> >      3.05%  [kernel]          [k] __blk_complete_request
> >      2.07%  [kernel]          [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath
> >      1.93%  [vdso]            [.] 0x0000000000000484
> > 
> > 
> > Was this just missed? Or is there a good reason to omit?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > John
> > 
> > --->8---
> > 
> > Subject: [PATCH] perf: Add perf top support for arm64
> > 
> > Copied from get_cpuid_str() essentially...
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
> > b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
> > index a32e4b72a98f..ecd1f86e29cc 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c
> > @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
> >  #include <stdio.h>
> >  #include <stdlib.h>
> >  #include <perf/cpumap.h>
> > +#include <util/cpumap.h>
> >  #include <internal/cpumap.h>
> >  #include <api/fs/fs.h>
> >  #include "debug.h"
> >  #include "header.h"
> > +#include <errno.h>
> > 
> >  #define MIDR "/regs/identification/midr_el1"
> >  #define MIDR_SIZE 19
> > @@ -12,6 +14,59 @@
> >  #define MIDR_VARIANT_SHIFT      20
> >  #define MIDR_VARIANT_MASK       (0xf << MIDR_VARIANT_SHIFT)
> > 
> > +int
> > +get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
> > +{
> > +	char *buf = NULL;
> > +	char path[PATH_MAX];
> > +	const char *sysfs = sysfs__mountpoint();
> > +	int cpu;
> > +	u64 midr = 0;
> > +	FILE *file;
> > +
> > +	if (!sysfs)
> > +		return EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	buf = malloc(MIDR_SIZE);
> > +	if (!buf)
> > +		return EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* read midr from list of cpus mapped to this pmu */
> > +	for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu__max_present_cpu(); cpu++) {
> > +		scnprintf(path, sz, "%s/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d"MIDR,
> > +				sysfs, cpu);
> > +
> > +		file = fopen(path, "r");
> > +		if (!file) {
> > +			pr_debug("fopen failed for file %s\n", path);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (!fgets(buf, MIDR_SIZE, file)) {
> > +			fclose(file);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +		fclose(file);
> > +
> > +		/* Ignore/clear Variant[23:20] and
> > +		 * Revision[3:0] of MIDR
> > +		 */
> > +		midr = strtoul(buf, NULL, 16);
> > +		midr &= (~(MIDR_VARIANT_MASK | MIDR_REVISION_MASK));
> > +		scnprintf(buffer, MIDR_SIZE, "0x%016lx", midr);
> > +		/* got midr break loop */
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!midr) {
> > +		pr_err("failed to get cpuid string\n");
> > +		free(buf);
> > +		return EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > 

-- 

- Arnaldo