| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:54:18 +0800
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
To: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/12] soc: mediatek: Use bp_table for all compatibles
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:31 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> Only use bp_table for bus protection of all compatibles,
> instead of mixing bus_prot_mask and bus_prot_reg_update.
ditto, I'd just squash in the previous patch.
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> index 5699d9f..c438c53 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> -#include <linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h>
> #include <linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h>
>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/mt2701-power.h>
> @@ -88,7 +87,6 @@
> * @ctl_offs: The offset for main power control register.
> * @sram_pdn_bits: The mask for sram power control bits.
> * @sram_pdn_ack_bits: The mask for sram power control acked bits.
> - * @bus_prot_mask: The mask for single step bus protection.
> * @basic_clk_name: The basic clocks required by this power domain.
> * @caps: The flag for active wake-up action.
> * @bp_table: The mask table for multiple step bus protection.
> @@ -99,7 +97,6 @@ struct scp_domain_data {
> int ctl_offs;
> u32 sram_pdn_bits;
> u32 sram_pdn_ack_bits;
> - u32 bus_prot_mask;
> const char *basic_clk_name[MAX_CLKS];
> u8 caps;
> struct bus_prot bp_table[MAX_STEPS];
> @@ -128,7 +125,6 @@ struct scp {
> struct regmap *infracfg;
> struct regmap *smi_common;
> struct scp_ctrl_reg ctrl_reg;
> - bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> };
>
> struct scp_subdomain {
> @@ -142,7 +138,6 @@ struct scp_soc_data {
> const struct scp_subdomain *subdomains;
> int num_subdomains;
> const struct scp_ctrl_reg regs;
> - bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> };
>
> static int scpsys_domain_is_on(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> @@ -256,12 +251,6 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> {
> struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
>
> - if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> - return mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> - scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> - }
> -
> return mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(scpd->data->bp_table,
> scp->infracfg, scp->smi_common);
> }
> @@ -270,12 +259,6 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> {
> struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
>
> - if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> - return mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> - scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> - }
> -
> return mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection(scpd->data->bp_table,
> scp->infracfg, scp->smi_common);
> }
> @@ -412,8 +395,7 @@ static int init_basic_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk **clk,
>
> static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data, int num,
> - const struct scp_ctrl_reg *scp_ctrl_reg,
> - bool bus_prot_reg_update)
> + const struct scp_ctrl_reg *scp_ctrl_reg)
> {
> struct genpd_onecell_data *pd_data;
> struct resource *res;
> @@ -427,8 +409,6 @@ static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> scp->ctrl_reg.pwr_sta_offs = scp_ctrl_reg->pwr_sta_offs;
> scp->ctrl_reg.pwr_sta2nd_offs = scp_ctrl_reg->pwr_sta2nd_offs;
>
> - scp->bus_prot_reg_update = bus_prot_reg_update;
> -
> scp->dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -549,8 +529,10 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .name = "conn",
> .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_CONN,
> .ctl_offs = SPM_CONN_PWR_CON,
> - .bus_prot_mask = MT2701_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_CONN_M |
> - MT2701_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_CONN_S,
> + .bp_table = {
> + BUS_PROT(IFR_TYPE, 0, 0, 0x220, 0x228,
> + BIT(2) | BIT(8), BIT(2) | BIT(8)),
> + },
I'm a bit sad we lose the information about the BIT meaning.
Of course this looks ugly and verbose:
BUS_PROT(IFR_TYPE, 0, 0, 0x220, 0x228,
MT2701_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_CONN_M |
MT2701_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_CONN_S,
MT2701_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_CONN_M |
MT2701_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_CONN_S),
But if you make "check_clr_mask" a boolean, you wouldn't have to
repeat the mask twice and you could keep the nice register bit
definitions.
[snip, many similar occurences below]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists