linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf/core: Add PERF_RECORD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 21 Dec 2019 17:49:02 +0900
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf/core: Add PERF_RECORD_CGROUP event

Hi Tejun,

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 12:16 AM Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:33:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 01:32:45PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > To support cgroup tracking, add CGROUP event to save a link between
> > > cgroup path and inode number.  The attr.cgroup bit was also added to
> > > enable cgroup tracking from userspace.
> > >
> > > This event will be generated when a new cgroup becomes active.
> > > Userspace might need to synthesize those events for existing cgroups.
> > >
> > > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> > > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> >
> > TJ, is this the right thing to do? ISTR you had concerns on this topic
> > on the past.
>
> Yeah, cgroup->id is now the same as ino (on 64bit ino matchines) and
> fhandle and uniquely identifies a cgroup instance in that boot
> instance.  That said, id -> path mapping can be done from userspace by
> passing the cgroup id to open_by_handle_at(2) and then reading the
> symlink in /proc/self/fd, so this event isn't necessary per-se if the
> goal is mapping back ids to paths.

But we should support offline report even on a different machine.
Also cgroups might go away during the record. so I think we need it
anyway.

Thanks
Namhyung