lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:12:38 +0100
From:   Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Scott Cheloha <cheloha@...ux.ibm.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/hotplug: assign hot added LMB to the right node

Le 03/12/2020 à 19:25, Greg KH a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:15:14AM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> This patch applies to 5.9 and earlier kernels only.
>>
>> Since 5.10, this has been fortunately fixed by the commit
>> e5e179aa3a39 ("pseries/drmem: don't cache node id in drmem_lmb struct").
> 
> Why can't we just backport that patch instead?  It's almost always
> better to do that than to have a one-off patch, as almost always those
> have bugs in them.

That's a good option too.
I was thinking that this 5.10 patch was not matching the stable release's 
guidelines since it was targeting performance issue, but since it is also fixing 
this issue, I'm certainly wrong.

So, forget that patch.

Thanks,
Laurent.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ