lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:15:22 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?)
 deferred TLB flush logic

Explicitly ignore the result of zap_gfn_range() when putting the last
reference to a TDP MMU root, and add a pile of comments to formalize the
TDP MMU's behavior of deferring TLB flushes to alloc/reuse.  Note, this
only affects the !shared case, as zap_gfn_range() subtly never returns
true for "flush" as the flush is handled by tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic().

Putting the root without a flush is ok because even if there are stale
references to the root in the TLB, they are unreachable because KVM will
not run the guest with the same ASID without first flushing (where ASID
in this context refers to both SVM's explicit ASID and Intel's implicit
ASID that is constructed from VPID+PCID+EPT4A+etc...).

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     |  8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 10 +++++++++-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 80607513a1f2..5a931c89d27b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5069,6 +5069,14 @@ int kvm_mmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	kvm_mmu_sync_roots(vcpu);
 
 	kvm_mmu_load_pgd(vcpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * Flush any TLB entries for the new root, the provenance of the root
+	 * is unknown.  In theory, even if KVM ensures there are no stale TLB
+	 * entries for a freed root, in theory, an out-of-tree hypervisor could
+	 * have left stale entries.  Flushing on alloc also allows KVM to skip
+	 * the TLB flush when freeing a root (see kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root()).
+	 */
 	static_call(kvm_x86_flush_tlb_current)(vcpu);
 out:
 	return r;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 12866113fb4f..e35bd88d92fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -93,7 +93,15 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 	list_del_rcu(&root->link);
 	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
 
-	zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, 0, -1ull, false, false, shared);
+	/*
+	 * A TLB flush is not necessary as KVM performs a local TLB flush when
+	 * allocating a new root (see kvm_mmu_load()), and when migrating vCPU
+	 * to a different pCPU.  Note, the local TLB flush on reuse also
+	 * invalidates any paging-structure-cache entries, i.e. TLB entries for
+	 * intermediate paging structures, that may be zapped, as such entries
+	 * are associated with the ASID on both VMX and SVM.
+	 */
+	(void)zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, 0, -1ull, false, false, shared);
 
 	call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
 }
-- 
2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ